This is my fully detailed idea to address the issue of balance in the current cloaking system on Tranquility as of this post

So your solution instead of addressing the solution is removing them from local so they have even more guaranteed free kills.

No that is not a solution and yes I am trying to break AFK cloaking. The same argument you make can be made for the "need" of AFK cloaking in any space. "We NEED to counter local" "We NEED to get these (free) kills"

If you can sit there in a system cloaked with access to Dscan then go take a shower take a nap or do what you want. I want it made risky. Not exempted.

Yes or no Mister Ingvar? Do you walk away or spend time not active in the client when cloaked?

You can't blob someone out of a system with my plan. They can only be uncloaked if they refuse to act or not paying attention otherwise an extended period under AFK.

Thing is. In reality my main has never been seriously harmed by AFK cloaking. And I have the RL financial resources to run a small power use computer to AFK cloak if I wanted to. Yet I don't because I think it is wrong and I KNOW it is giving the huge alliances unbalanced power.

With my main I can get into the big alliances that can put up the big fleets to prevent free hotdrops and have cyno jammers on without issue.

Yet I will continue to push this issue and these ideas for solutions.

I replied to someone again stating the "solution" is some big alliance buffing "remove local" deal. Similar to your idea I might add. Both aid the big alliances just differ in how much they "buff"

My idea targets the incentive to walk away while cloaked for long periods of time. It needs to be implemented or another idea that isn't some part "remove my ass from local so I can getz mah free solo kills for the few months they will line up and be mah target"

Because that was not what cloaking was intended for. AFK cloaking really exploded on the scene when the big alliances recently discovered just how useful it is against the smaller ones.

The incentive has to go

And removing local wont do that

Just give more incentive to AFK cloak to do real damage against those weaker than the huge alliances in game.

I guess there's lots of cloaky bomber pilots posting here! The point the OP is making is to try to make the AFK cloaker who just wants to shut down a system by warping to a safe spot cloaking up & going AFK in the knowledge that everyone is looking at local & sees a red in system & docks up. The psychological & physical risk is 100% on everyone else in that system & none on the cloaky guy.
A system like the OP says would at least make sure that any cloaky red in system is actively hunting/scouting & therefore moving rather than AFK & no threat, and is now a target.

if afk cloaking would be nerfed, instant local must go as well,
because afk cloaking is the only way currently to subvert local intel.

Its simple as that. Otherwise it would be too easy to avoid any danger.

There we have the "absolute safety" bullshit card again.

Do you really think I can undock in any ship, even a velator, go to sleep for 8+ hours and wake up to a ship and not a pod in a station?

Oh, so it's safety if I'm paying attention.

And I've tried this theory of undocking in a velator and just hanging around, multiple times. It's died every time.

And it brings out the ******** gankers who just want to remove local because they're so bad at ganking they can't even catch the unwary.

Oh really. A backwater end system with nobody else in system is "a wrong place"? What's the "right place" then?

No, it's not "like you said". You said "absolute safety", not "nearly absolute safety".

I guess next you'll say that having the possibility of detecting cloaked ships will bring forth "absolute safety" as well..

to be clear, I dont want any changes in regard to cloak and local at all, just pointing out they are interconnected and cant be changed separately without the other.

With my idea. Active cloakers can still find and kill idiots that don't watch local all the same.